M
Matt LaClear

How to Use AI to Create Content for Businesses

How to use AI to create content for businesses using human judgment and iteration
Matt LaClear Matt LaClear
7 min read

When I use AI to create content for businesses, I’m not looking for “faster writing.” I’m looking for content that earns rankings, sounds like a real human with real experience, and turns the right visitors into leads.

Here’s the process I use. It’s not a generic AI tutorial and it’s not hype-driven. It works because it’s built around judgment and iteration—two things most AI-generated content skips.

The focus keyword for this article is how to use AI to create content for businesses, and that’s not an accident. That’s exactly how I treat every piece of content I publish for a business.

Step 1: Start With the Focus Keyword

Every piece of content I create starts with one specific keyword. Not a topic. Not a vague idea. A keyword that a real person would type when they have a problem, a goal, or a buying decision in motion.

I’m choosing a focus keyword for two reasons:

  • Ranking relevance: If the keyword isn’t aligned with what the business offers (and what the customer actually wants), the content can’t do its job.
  • Decision relevance: I don’t just want traffic. I want the right traffic—people who are likely to become customers.

When I lock in the focus keyword, I also lock in what success looks like. The page needs to answer the question behind the query clearly enough that a decision-maker thinks: “This is the kind of company/person I’d trust.”

That’s the foundation. AI doesn’t choose that foundation for me—AI is a tool, not a strategy.

Step 2: Use AI to Match User Intent

Once the keyword is chosen, I use AI to help me match the intent behind it with precision.

This is where most people miss. They treat AI like a writing machine and skip the thinking. I treat it like a fast collaborator that helps me pressure-test the intent.

I’ll have AI generate multiple interpretations of the search intent, such as:

  • What the searcher is trying to accomplish
  • What “good” looks like to them when they land on the page
  • What would disappoint them (and cause a bounce)
  • What a ready-to-buy visitor would want to see to take action

Then I shape the content direction around the best match.

If I get intent wrong, the content fails—even if the writing is “good.” When I’m satisfied I understand the intent, I use AI to draft a structure that matches it: the order of sections, the questions to answer, and what proof or specificity the page needs. This keeps the content SEO-first without turning it into robotic “SEO content.”

Step 3: Evaluate the Content Like It’s Paid Work

After AI produces a draft (or parts of a draft), I don’t treat it like it’s “close enough.” I treat it like a freelancer turned in work and expects to get paid.

That means it has to pass real standards, including:

  • Accuracy: No guessing. No confident-sounding filler. No claims that can’t be supported.
  • Clarity: A business owner should understand it quickly without rereading paragraphs.
  • Specificity: Real examples, concrete explanations, and direct takeaways—not generic advice.
  • Voice: It needs to sound like a competent operator, not like a textbook.
  • Intent match: Every section should help the visitor accomplish what they came for.
  • Conversion readiness: The content should naturally lead to the next step without sounding pushy.

If it fails any of those, it’s not “done.” It’s a draft that needs work.

This is the part most AI content never gets: quality comes from human judgment and iteration.

Step 4: Repeat Evaluation Until the Content Is Loved

I rework and re-evaluate until I actually like the content.

Not “it’s fine.” Not “it’s good for AI.” Loved—meaning I’d confidently attach my name to it and publish it for a business I care about.

Here’s what I’m looking for when I repeat the evaluation:

  • Does this answer the question better than what a busy person can find in 30 seconds?
  • Does it sound like someone who has done this work before?
  • Does it remove confusion and reduce decision friction?
  • Would I trust this page if I were about to spend money?

If the answer is “not yet,” I revise and run the evaluation again. This is the loop that separates content that ranks (and converts) from content that just fills a page.

And to be blunt: most AI content fails because it skips evaluation. People publish the first pass and wonder why it doesn’t perform.

Step 5: Ask AI How to Make the Content More Effective

Once the content is solid, I use AI again—but this time not as a writer. As a reviewer.

I ask for improvements in areas that matter for performance:

  • Where the structure is confusing
  • Where the explanation is too vague
  • Where the flow doesn’t match intent
  • Where a section needs a stronger example
  • Where the page could be more persuasive without becoming salesy
  • Where readers may have objections or unanswered questions

This step is less about “more words” and more about more effectiveness. I want tighter writing, better sequencing, and fewer places where a visitor might lose trust.

I don’t accept every suggestion. I’m using AI to surface options and blind spots—not to outsource judgment.

Step 6: Loop Back to Evaluation

After I apply the improvements, I go right back to the same standard from Step 3.

I evaluate it again like paid work.

This is important because edits can break things:

  • A clearer paragraph can accidentally remove necessary context.
  • A stronger headline can drift away from the focus keyword.
  • A new section can dilute intent or introduce fluff.

So I re-check accuracy, clarity, specificity, voice, intent match, and conversion readiness. If it passes, I publish. If it doesn’t, I iterate again.

Why this process works (and why it scales)

This workflow is repeatable because it’s not dependent on inspiration. It’s dependent on standards.

  • AI is a tool, not a strategy. The strategy is choosing the right keyword, matching intent, and producing something worth ranking.
  • Quality comes from human judgment and iteration. The evaluation loop is where content becomes credible.
  • Most AI content fails because it skips evaluation. Publishing first drafts is the fastest way to blend in.
  • This process is repeatable and scalable for businesses because once the standards are defined, the loop can be repeated across pages and resources without quality collapsing.

If you want a simple takeaway: I don’t use AI to “create content.” I use it to accelerate drafting and reviewing—then I apply a quality bar that forces the content to earn its place on the site.

Want more marketing + SEO ideas like this?

Listen to the podcast or read the featured article to apply this faster.